Re: pg_upgrade

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Daniel Kalchev <daniel(at)digsys(dot)bg>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade
Date: 2002-01-11 05:42:45
Message-ID: 200201110542.g0B5gjm18397@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Daniel Kalchev wrote:
> >>>Bruce Momjian said:
> > I will not enable it until everyone agrees. Are there people interested
> > in this tool being in 7.2, or who are against this tool being in 7.2?
>
> I have never trusted pg_upgrade on production databases. This is where it is
> actually targeted to (to minimize downtime). I have always done full
> pg_dumpall and then full recreation of the database system, which
> unfortunately in my cases take few hours. With so many little changes in the
> structures pg_upgrade it is probably not very safe method anyway?
>
> Just my opinion. :-)

I agree. There are just too many people who complain to me about a lack
of pg_upgrade that I have to do my best on it and let people decide if
they want to use it.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-01-11 06:00:51 Re: pg_upgrade
Previous Message Daniel Kalchev 2002-01-11 05:40:41 Re: pg_upgrade