From: | Holger Krug <hkrug(at)rationalizer(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bear Giles <bear(at)coyotesong(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: JDBC: why is PGobject class instead of interface? |
Date: | 2002-01-08 15:11:24 |
Message-ID: | 20020108161124.A9186@dev12.rationalizer.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 05:00:35PM -0700, Bear Giles wrote:
> I can implement the mapping by casting between the objects and text,
> but if a type extension mechanism is available it would be nice to be
> able to hide those details from the user.
The type extension mechanism inherent in JDBC is provided by an
implementation of java.sql.Connection.setTypeMap(Map map) and related
methods. The PostgreSQL JDBC driver has not yet got this feature. I
think it would be fine if somebody would add this to PostgreSQL ;-)
--
Holger Krug
hkrug(at)rationalizer(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Holger Krug | 2002-01-08 15:13:22 | Re: Time as keyword |
Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2002-01-08 15:00:11 | Re: GETTIMEOFDAY_1ARG change |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Barry Lind | 2002-01-08 17:49:47 | Re: best way to use bitvarying? |
Previous Message | Anil Jangam | 2002-01-08 13:08:44 | Re: Feature enquiry in pgsql driver. |