| From: | Martín Marqués <martin(at)bugs(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Peter Darley" <pdarley(at)Kinesis-CEM(dot)com>, "Campano, Troy" <Troy(dot)Campano(at)LibertyMutual(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Shutting down postgresql |
| Date: | 2001-12-28 20:30:03 |
| Message-ID: | 20011228203004.7B040FBE1@bugs.unl.edu.ar |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Vie 28 Dic 2001 13:16, Peter Darley wrote:
> Troy,
> Something that caught me up at first is that PostgreSQL won't shut down
> until all it's backends close, which means that if you have an application
> connected that uses pooled or cached connections you will probably have to
> shut it down first.
pg_ctl stop -m immediate
Saludos... :-)
--
Porqué usar una base de datos relacional cualquiera,
si podés usar PostgreSQL?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Martín Marqués | mmarques(at)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar
Programador, Administrador, DBA | Centro de Telematica
Universidad Nacional
del Litoral
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-12-28 20:30:04 | Re: postgres processes spending most of their time in the |
| Previous Message | Martín Marqués | 2001-12-28 20:27:17 | Re: Shutting down postgresql |