Re: SunOS patch for memcmp()

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SunOS patch for memcmp()
Date: 2001-12-20 05:07:57
Message-ID: 200112200507.fBK57vj27293@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > OK, what do people want with the memcmp() fix? Tatsuo and I say apply,
> > Tom is yes, or was,
>
> Still is. I don't want to gin up a strtol fix from scratch at this
> late date in our cycle, but I think that the memcmp fix is safe.

OK, good. I will put the strtol on my list for 7.3. The memcmp is much
more significant. Overflow is minor for most uses.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-12-20 05:17:18 Re: SunOS patch for memcmp()
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-12-20 05:06:06 Re: SunOS patch for memcmp()

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-12-20 05:17:18 Re: SunOS patch for memcmp()
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-12-20 05:06:06 Re: SunOS patch for memcmp()