Re: temp tables versus the global sql area

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Terrence Brannon <metaperl(at)mac(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: temp tables versus the global sql area
Date: 2001-12-17 05:37:52
Message-ID: 200112170537.fBH5bqS06826@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice pgsql-sql

> In the Momjian book it is stated:
>
> Temporary tables are ideal for holding intermediate data used by
> the current SQL session. For example, suppose you need to do many
> SELECTs on the result of a complex query. An efficient strategy
> is to execute the complex query once, then store the result in a
> temporary table.
>
>
> ...However, my question is doesn't postgresql calculate the cost
> of complex queries and store there result in some sort of global
> sql area sorted by LRU or cost so that you can simply write
> complex queries and take care of automatic caching?

Nope. Sorry. Those caches would have to be invalidated if someone made
a change to those tables.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Terrence Brannon 2001-12-17 10:41:09 Re: Numbering Rows (SEQUENCE, OID) questions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-12-17 01:33:30 Re: why doesn't \d table_name show the table inheritance graph?

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-12-17 05:39:27 Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2001-12-17 04:06:14 Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction