Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction

From: MindTerm <mindterm(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction
Date: 2001-12-14 03:34:28
Message-ID: 20011214033428.93468.qmail@web20203.mail.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Hi all,

I will try to assign more memory to shared memory,
say 50M ~ 100M .

I am runing something like that ..

cursor loop 1
cursor loop 2
cursor loop 3
tmp = primary key
delete tmp ....
insert tmp ....
end loop 3
end loop 2
end loop 3

will delete and insert record with same primary key
within a transaction reduce the performance ?

M.T.

--- Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, MindTerm wrote:
>
> > I am writing a function (plpgsql) which equals
> to a
> > single transaction transaction in postgresql ( as
> I
> > known ). So I think that it is not a autocommmit
> mode.
> >
> > I have add following lines in postgresql.conf.
> >
> > postgresql.conf:
> > ====================
> > shared_buffers = 640
> > wal_buffers = 80
>
> It depends on how much memory you have, but even 640
> is pretty
> low (I think that works out to 5M). Probably a few
> thousand
> is better if you've got the ram.
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2001-12-14 03:43:59 Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2001-12-14 03:02:05 Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction