Re: email time warps

On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 01:28:35AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> so that any further regurgitations won't get through. Are you seeing
> new old stuff? I'm not...

Well, I just saw some items dated May, 2001. I didn't save them though.

However, since I sent that email, I've received the following:

6 N Nov 16 James Huang ( 97) [GENERAL] [ANN] A Genuine JDBC Scripting
10 N Nov 18 Eric Theis ( 16) [ADMIN] Postmaster will not start???
11 N Nov 19 Raoul Callaghan ( 61) [GENERAL] Postmaster on OSX 10.1.1 what's
12 N Nov 18 Peter Ondruska ( 23) [GENERAL] build fails on Solaris 8 x_86 w
15 N Nov 19 dino ck ( 8) [SQL] How to return more than one row of
16 N Nov 19 Neil Zanella ( 17) [GENERAL] checking date format with postg

Now, the 19th doesn't really surprise me. After all, I know that email is
not supposed to be an instaneous communication medium.

However, the 16th?

Upon closer inspection, is shows:

Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by rs.postgresql.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fAK5bpx39293
for <dalgoda(at)ix(dot)netcom(dot)com>; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 23:38:16 -0600 (CST)
(envelope-from pgsql-general-owner+M17719=ix(dot)netcom(dot)com=dalgoda(at)postgresql(dot)org)

Received: from news.tht.net (news.hub.org [216.126.91.242])
by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id fAH85Nm65518
for <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>; Sat, 17 Nov 2001 03:05:23 -0500 (EST)
(envelope-from news(at)news(dot)tht(dot)net)

Organization: http://groups.google.com/

Looks like maybe degoogleja is a little behind the times?

mrc
--
Mike Castle dalgoda(at)ix(dot)netcom(dot)com www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal ("You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different"); -- gcc