Re: Can't find docs on Postgresql.conf

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Roberto Mello <rmello(at)cc(dot)usu(dot)edu>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Can't find docs on Postgresql.conf
Date: 2001-11-08 02:36:00
Message-ID: 200111080236.fA82a0W25553@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

> On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 07:21:09PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > I was talking to Ben Adida last week (OpenACS) and he mentioned they are
> > having problems with the limit at 16, and it seems Josh is as well. Ben
> > is doing some object-oriented function mechanism, and you know how that
> > can eat parameters. Seems we should increase to 24 or 32. Is there a
> > downside to the increase. I can't even imagine a performance hit.
>
> Indeed we (at OpenACS) could use more parameters.
>
> We are porting a zillion Oracle PL/SQL functions to Postgres, and in
> Oracle you can have optional parameters and default values. In PostgreSQL
> we have to overload functions to make up for the possible combinations.
>
> In this process, sometimes we run out of parameters and have to submit to
> more, errr, creative ways to get the job done.

Good. Will 24 params be enough for you?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Denis Bucher 2001-11-08 11:06:14 Solution found ! Re: Need help with embedded CASEs
Previous Message Roberto Mello 2001-11-08 00:42:42 ISO SQL 92/99 paper?