From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Roberto Mello <rmello(at)cc(dot)usu(dot)edu> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Can't find docs on Postgresql.conf |
Date: | 2001-11-08 02:36:00 |
Message-ID: | 200111080236.fA82a0W25553@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 07:21:09PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > I was talking to Ben Adida last week (OpenACS) and he mentioned they are
> > having problems with the limit at 16, and it seems Josh is as well. Ben
> > is doing some object-oriented function mechanism, and you know how that
> > can eat parameters. Seems we should increase to 24 or 32. Is there a
> > downside to the increase. I can't even imagine a performance hit.
>
> Indeed we (at OpenACS) could use more parameters.
>
> We are porting a zillion Oracle PL/SQL functions to Postgres, and in
> Oracle you can have optional parameters and default values. In PostgreSQL
> we have to overload functions to make up for the possible combinations.
>
> In this process, sometimes we run out of parameters and have to submit to
> more, errr, creative ways to get the job done.
Good. Will 24 params be enough for you?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Denis Bucher | 2001-11-08 11:06:14 | Solution found ! Re: Need help with embedded CASEs |
Previous Message | Roberto Mello | 2001-11-08 00:42:42 | ISO SQL 92/99 paper? |