Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: SQLCODE==-209

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: John Summerfield <pgtest(at)os2(dot)ami(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQLCODE==-209
Date: 2001-10-16 15:03:34
Message-ID: 200110161503.f9GF3Y129274@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-patches
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> 
> >
> > I have added documentation for code 209.  Looks like there are other
> > undocumented ones.  Should we document them all?
> 
> If you're asking me, I'm all in favour of documenting them;-)
> 
> I'm not a fan of "Read the source," though I do it if I'm desperate.

I can easily document them all if it would help people.  Seems you can't
really test error codes in your app unless you know the codes.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-10-16 15:28:38
Subject: Re: Bug #478: Integer overflow in pg_dump
Previous:From: EricDate: 2001-10-16 14:40:34
Subject: Dumps/Reloads

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Marko KreenDate: 2001-10-16 18:21:02
Subject: pgcrypto in HISTORY
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-10-16 14:34:48
Subject: Re: IPv6 Support for INET/CIDR types.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group