Re: Ready for Beta?

From: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Ready for Beta?
Date: 2001-10-16 04:16:20
Message-ID: 20011016131620H.t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Are we ready to start beta on 7.2?

For me, the only remaining issue is follwing. Since it seems there's
no objection, I will commit the changes in a few hours (I'm getting
ride on a train for a business trip. The train is coming...)
--
Tatsuo Ishii

>Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_client_encoding
>From: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
>To: phede-ml(at)islande(dot)org
>Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
>Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 10:05:20 +0900
>X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.2 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.1 (葵)
>
>> * Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> [011014 16:05]:
>> > > > ASCII SQL_ASCII
>> > > > UTF-8 UNICODE UTF_8
>> > > > MULE-INTERNAL MULE_INTERNAL
>> > > > ISO-8859-1 LATIN1 ISO_8859_1
>> > > > ISO-8859-2 LATIN2 ISO_8859_2
>> > > > ISO-8859-3 LATIN3 ISO_8859_3
>> > > > ISO-8859-4 LATIN4 ISO_8859_4
>> > > > ISO-8859-5 ISO_8859_5
>> > > > ISO-8859-6 ISO_8859_6
>> > > > ISO-8859-7 ISO_8859_7
>> > > > ISO-8859-8 ISO_8859_8
>> > > > ISO-8859-9 LATIN5 ISO_8859_9
>> > > > ISO-8859-10 ISO_8859_10 LATIN6
>> > > > ISO-8859-13 ISO_8859_13 LATIN7
>> > > > ISO-8859-14 ISO_8859_14 LATIN8
>> > > > ISO-8859-15 ISO_8859_15 LATIN9
>> > > > ISO-8859-16 ISO_8859_16
>> > >
>> > > Why aren't you using LATINx for (some of) these as well?
>> >
>> > If LATIN6 to 9 are well defined in the SQL or some other standards, I
>> > would not object using them. I just don't have enough confidence.
>> > For ISO-8859-5 to 8, and 16, I don't see well defined standards.
>>
>> ISO-8859-16 *is* LATIN10, I just don't have the reference to prove it
>> (I can look for it, if you want to).
>>
>> ISO-8859-5 to 8 aren't latin scripts. From memory, 5 is cyrillic, 6 is
>> arabic, 7 is greek, 8 is ??? (hebrew ?)...
>>
>> So it would make sense to add LATIN10, still :)
>
>If you were sure ISO-8859-16 == LATIN10, I could add it.
>
>Ok, here is the modified encoding table (column1 is the standard name,
>2 is our "official" name, and 3 is alias). If there's no objection, I
>will change them.
>
>ASCII SQL_ASCII
>UTF-8 UNICODE UTF_8
>MULE-INTERNAL MULE_INTERNAL
>ISO-8859-1 LATIN1 ISO_8859_1
>ISO-8859-2 LATIN2 ISO_8859_2
>ISO-8859-3 LATIN3 ISO_8859_3
>ISO-8859-4 LATIN4 ISO_8859_4
>ISO-8859-5 ISO_8859_5
>ISO-8859-6 ISO_8859_6
>ISO-8859-7 ISO_8859_7
>ISO-8859-8 ISO_8859_8
>ISO-8859-9 LATIN5 ISO_8859_9
>ISO-8859-10 LATIN6 ISO_8859_10
>ISO-8859-13 LATIN7 ISO_8859_13
>ISO-8859-14 LATIN8 ISO_8859_14
>ISO-8859-15 LATIN9 ISO_8859_15
>ISO-8859-16 LATIN10 ISO_8859_16

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-10-16 04:57:13 Re: When will vacuum go away?
Previous Message Nathan Reilly 2001-10-16 03:30:38 Replication