| From: | Martín Marqués <martin(at)bugs(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: syslog by default? |
| Date: | 2001-09-11 22:14:54 |
| Message-ID: | 20010911221456.69C462AB44@bugs.unl.edu.ar |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mar 11 Sep 2001 02:07, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > There was a discussion about --enable-syslog by default. What was the
> > consensus? I think this is a good one.
>
> Yes, I thought we decided it should be the default too.
There was a discusion about log rotation last week, so, where are we going?
Pipe the output of postmaster to a log rotator like apaches logrotate, or are
we going to use syslog and have the syslog log rotator do the rotation?
Just a dought I had.
Saludos... :-)
--
Porqué usar una base de datos relacional cualquiera,
si podés usar PostgreSQL?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Martín Marqués | mmarques(at)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar
Programador, Administrador, DBA | Centro de Telematica
Universidad Nacional
del Litoral
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2001-09-11 23:11:52 | Re: syslog by default? |
| Previous Message | Giles Lean | 2001-09-11 21:56:11 | Re: syslog by default? |