Re: RFC: PostgreSQL and MySQL comparison.

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Alexey Borzov <borz_off(at)rdw(dot)ru>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RFC: PostgreSQL and MySQL comparison.
Date: 2001-08-30 00:25:58
Message-ID: 20010830102558.A10859@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 09:32:59PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Alexey Borzov writes:
> Okay, I answered them:
>
> http://webmail.postgresql.org/~petere/comparison.html

In that document you say:

> By the way, PostgreSQL does support multiple storage managers; not as
> easily today as in the early days, but that is mostly due to the fact that
> no one ever wanted to replace the current one.

Does this mean that in the 7.1 tree one could include the storage manager
for 7.0, thus being able to read both types, or is it more complicated than
that?

--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
http://svana.org/kleptog/
> It would be nice if someone came up with a certification system that
> actually separated those who can barely regurgitate what they crammed over
> the last few weeks from those who command secret ninja networking powers.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Colin Campbell 2001-08-30 00:40:48 Re: ERROR: int8 conversion to int4 is out of range
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2001-08-30 00:15:42 Re: Problem with libpsqlodbc