Re: User locks code

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Trond Eivind Glomsrød <teg(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>, Massimo Dal Zotto <dz(at)cs(dot)unitn(dot)it>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: User locks code
Date: 2001-08-24 16:03:34
Message-ID: 200108241603.f7OG3Y004035@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
> > > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I definitely agree with Vadim here: it's fairly silly that the
> > > > contrib userlock code is GPL'd, when it consists only of a few dozen
> > > > lines of wrapper for the real functionality that's in the main backend.
> > >
> >
> > I was incorrect in something I said to Vadim. I said stored procedures
> > would have to be released if linked against a GPL'ed backend.
>
> Only to those you actually distribute this product to. If you're using
> it internally, you have no obligations to release it to anyone, to
> give one example.

Yes, I was speaking only of selling the software. Good point.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-08-24 16:06:23 Re: PATCH proposed with new features for CREATE TABLE
Previous Message Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?= 2001-08-24 16:02:54 Re: User locks code