Re: Patches (current CVS) for changes if index AM tables

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patches (current CVS) for changes if index AM tables
Date: 2001-08-16 16:39:41
Message-ID: 200108161639.f7GGdf102951@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:

http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches

I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.

> Hi,
>
> we finished first stage of our proposal for changing of index AM tables
> (see for reference http://fts.postgresql.org/db/mw/msg.html?mid=1029290)
>
> I attached 3 files:
>
> 1. patch_72_systbl.gz - patch to current CVS
> 2. btree_gist.tar.gz - contrib/btree_gist module -
> implementation of Btree using GiST with
> support of int4 and timestamp types.
> 3. test.tar.gz - test suite for brave (not for applying !)
>
> Regression tests and our tests passed fine
> Patch is for today CVS, please apply them asap to avoid possible
> conflicts.
>
> Now we're going to 2nd stage of our proposal.
> We plan to remove pg_index.indislossy (now we have pg_amop.amopreqcheck)
> and pg_index.indhaskeytype (it's just don't used, all functionality
> is in pg_opclass.opckeytype now)
>
> question:
>
> Do we need to normalize pg_amop and pg_amproc tables ?
> Tom was concerned (http://fts.postgresql.org/db/mw/msg.html?mid=1025860)
> about possible performance degradation.
>
> We think it's possible to leave tables as is. Of course it'd require
> some attention when updating these tables.
>
>
> Regards,
> Oleg
> _____________________________________________________________
> Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
> Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
> Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
> phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83

Content-Description:

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

Content-Description:

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

Content-Description:

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2001-08-16 16:59:36 Re: encoding names
Previous Message Justin Clift 2001-08-16 16:33:46 Re: PostgreSQL buffer exploits