From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords |
Date: | 2001-08-15 21:51:22 |
Message-ID: | 200108152151.f7FLpMF09612@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > In fact, because the md5 patch
> > didn't make anyone ill,
>
> The lack of objections may just mean that twelve hours wasn't sufficient
> time for people to review it.
I am doing SCM now. If you want it backed out, I can do it. I am not
making much headway in the SCM stuff anyway.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-08-15 21:52:59 | Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-08-15 21:50:16 | Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords |