Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Date: 2001-08-15 21:51:22
Message-ID: 200108152151.f7FLpMF09612@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > In fact, because the md5 patch
> > didn't make anyone ill,
>
> The lack of objections may just mean that twelve hours wasn't sufficient
> time for people to review it.

I am doing SCM now. If you want it backed out, I can do it. I am not
making much headway in the SCM stuff anyway.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-08-15 21:52:59 Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-08-15 21:50:16 Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords