| From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | roypgsqlgen(at)xemaps(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: why no stored procedures? |
| Date: | 2001-08-15 02:50:31 |
| Message-ID: | 200108150250.f7F2oVY01964@jupiter.us.greatbridge.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
roypgsqlgen(at)xemaps(dot)com wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Is there any reason why there are no stored procedures for postgresql or
> does this have to do with the ability to add your own procedural
> language?
What exactly do you mean with "there are no stored
procedures"?
I mean, we have more procedural languages than any other
database and with the upcoming v7.2 we will even have
reference cursors for PL/pgSQL to pass them into and out of
functions. So could you detail your question please?
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert J. Sanford, Jr. | 2001-08-15 03:05:30 | RE: why no stored procedures? |
| Previous Message | Justin Clift | 2001-08-15 02:22:20 | Re: OpenLDAP - Postgresql HOWTO |