| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jochem van Dieten <jochemd(at)oli(dot)tudelft(dot)nl> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgresQL equivalent of NOCOUNT |
| Date: | 2001-08-14 14:50:06 |
| Message-ID: | 20010815005006.A7173@svana.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 03:38:08PM +0200, Jochem van Dieten wrote:
> Does PostgresQL have some way to make update, insert and delete queries
> not return the number of affected rows? I know that in MS SQL one would
> use NOCOUNT for that.
Just ignore the result. Postgres has to find all the rows anyway, so
avoiding counting them is hardly going to save any time.
Am I missing something?
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
http://svana.org/kleptog/
> It would be nice if someone came up with a certification system that
> actually separated those who can barely regurgitate what they crammed over
> the last few weeks from those who command secret ninja networking powers.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-08-14 14:57:52 | Re: Re: Use int8 for int4/int2 aggregate accumulators? |
| Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2001-08-14 14:49:36 | OT: Warning about errors in ZDNET article |