From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Postgresql General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Partial indicies again |
Date: | 2001-07-10 16:00:03 |
Message-ID: | 20010711020003.B32042@svana.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 05:36:35PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout writes:
>
> > > FYI, it's called partial "indexes".
> >
> > Actually, it seems to depend on who you ask. Both spellings are scattered
> > throughout the documentation and the source. According to my dictionary,
> > both spellings are allowed.
>
> We consulted some dictionaries a while ago and decided that "indexes" is
> the correct form for this usage. Not everything has been changed to that
> effect yet, but it will soon. In any case, the alternative
> would be "indices".
*blink*
You're right, put one too many I's in there. I'll correct that.
So everything is going to be changed to the other spelling soon anyway?
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
http://svana.org/kleptog/
> It would be nice if someone came up with a certification system that
> actually separated those who can barely regurgitate what they crammed over
> the last few weeks from those who command secret ninja networking powers.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Janning Vygen | 2001-07-10 16:21:12 | Re: error handling. How to? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-07-10 15:55:54 | Re: index skipped in favor of seq scan. |