Re: [PATCH] Partial indicies again

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Postgresql General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Partial indicies again
Date: 2001-07-10 16:00:03
Message-ID: 20010711020003.B32042@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 05:36:35PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout writes:
>
> > > FYI, it's called partial "indexes".
> >
> > Actually, it seems to depend on who you ask. Both spellings are scattered
> > throughout the documentation and the source. According to my dictionary,
> > both spellings are allowed.
>
> We consulted some dictionaries a while ago and decided that "indexes" is
> the correct form for this usage. Not everything has been changed to that
> effect yet, but it will soon. In any case, the alternative
> would be "indices".

*blink*

You're right, put one too many I's in there. I'll correct that.

So everything is going to be changed to the other spelling soon anyway?

--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
http://svana.org/kleptog/
> It would be nice if someone came up with a certification system that
> actually separated those who can barely regurgitate what they crammed over
> the last few weeks from those who command secret ninja networking powers.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Janning Vygen 2001-07-10 16:21:12 Re: error handling. How to?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-07-10 15:55:54 Re: index skipped in favor of seq scan.