Re: (was: )

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: "Thomas T(dot) Veldhouse" <veldy(at)veldy(dot)net>, tamsin <tg_mail(at)bryncadfan(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: (was: )
Date: 2001-06-29 18:43:10
Message-ID: 200106291843.f5TIhAr07981@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-sql

> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> > > >
> > > > PS There is a lot of HTML email on this list. Is this generally considered good? Or should I convert my replies to text?
> > > >
> > >
> > > This is generally considered annoying, as lines >80
> > > characters are :-P
> > >
> > > Wasn't meant offensive - just couldn't resist.
> >
> > Let's not forget email with no subject, like this one.
>
> Come on, let's create some mega-off-topic thread about if
> "Re: [GENERAL]" is a subject or not. :-)

Maybe we should create a totally inapropriate email and show it to
everyone.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2001-06-29 18:47:45 Re: (was: )
Previous Message GH 2001-06-29 18:37:48 Re:

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2001-06-29 18:47:45 Re: (was: )
Previous Message GH 2001-06-29 18:37:48 Re: