Re:

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: "Thomas T(dot) Veldhouse" <veldy(at)veldy(dot)net>, tamsin <tg_mail(at)bryncadfan(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re:
Date: 2001-06-29 18:31:33
Message-ID: 200106291831.f5TIVX407495@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-sql

> Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> >
> > PS There is a lot of HTML email on this list. Is this generally considered good? Or should I convert my replies to text?
> >
>
> This is generally considered annoying, as lines >80
> characters are :-P
>
> Wasn't meant offensive - just couldn't resist.

Let's not forget email with no subject, like this one.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

  • Re: at 2001-06-29 17:33:11 from Jan Wieck

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2001-06-29 18:34:07 Re: no comment
Previous Message Thomas T. Veldhouse 2001-06-29 18:25:48 Re: no comment

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message GH 2001-06-29 18:37:48 Re:
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-06-29 18:01:41 Re: Plain text vs HTML mail