| From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Setuid functions |
| Date: | 2001-06-25 13:15:04 |
| Message-ID: | 200106251315.f5PDF4v08038@jupiter.us.greatbridge.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Philip Warner wrote:
> At 13:28 24/06/01 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >
> >If someone wants to implement them, be my guest. I originally needed them
> >for fixing the RI permission problems, but they couldn't be used for that
> >after all.
> >
>
> They were part of a larger permissions overhaul that Jan proposed - IIRC,
> at the time you objected, citing your prior proposal. Are you now saying
> you are happy with Jan's original proposal? Or just the setuid functions?
More a bunch of ideas instead of a fully thought through
proposal. But IIRC we wanted to attack the overhaul of the
access control system while doing schemas - no?
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Volpe | 2001-06-25 13:19:27 | Re: AW: [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2001-06-25 12:52:02 | Re: RE: [BUGS] Update is not atomic |