Re: Why would this use 600Meg of VM?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why would this use 600Meg of VM?
Date: 2001-06-24 21:08:10
Message-ID: 200106242108.f5OL8BY29055@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> At 01:06 24/06/01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> >The answer: the query has nothing to do with it. However, the
> >deferred triggers you have on the target relation have a lot to do
> >with it. It's all deferred-trigger-event storage.
>
> Would it be worth using a local (system) temporary table for this sort of
> thing?

Jan intially wanted to store large FK events in a file when they got too
big but never completed it.

The TODO list has:

* Add deferred trigger queue file (Jan)

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-24 21:18:34 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/bin/initdb initdb.sh
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-24 21:05:54 Re: [PATCH] by request: base64 for bytea