Re: [PATCH] by request: base64 for bytea

From: Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee>
To: Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] by request: base64 for bytea
Date: 2001-06-23 13:43:33
Message-ID: 20010623154333.A22027@l-t.ee
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 08:42:46AM -0400, Alex Pilosov wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Marko Kreen wrote:
> > Or I can extract it out from pgcrypto and submit to core ;)
> > I simply had not a need for it because I used those with
> > pgcrypto, but Alex seems to hint that there would be bit of
> > interest otherwise too.
> I think encode/decode should be part of core, as they are basic functions
> to manipulate bytea data...

Ok, I think I look into it. I am anyway preparing a big update
to pgcrypto.

Question to -hackers: currently there is not possible to cast
bytea to text and vice-versa. Is this intentional or bug?

It is weird because internal representation is exactly the same.
As I want my funtions to operate on both, do I need to create
separate funtion entries to every combination of parameters?
It gets crazy on encrypt_iv(data, key, iv, type) which has 3
parameters that can be both bytea or text...

--
marko

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-23 13:48:18 Re: [PATCH] by request: base64 for bytea
Previous Message Alex Pilosov 2001-06-23 12:42:46 Re: [PATCH] by request: base64 for bytea