Re: [HACKERS] Re: Multiple Indexing, performance impact

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Daniel Åkerud <zilch(at)home(dot)se>, PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Multiple Indexing, performance impact
Date: 2001-06-23 00:04:44
Message-ID: 200106230004.f5N04iK08743@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> We could offer a --with switch to manually choose the default, too.
>
> > Good idea, yes. Not sure if we need a --with switch because they can
> > just edit the postgresql.conf or postgresql.conf.sample file.
>
> Well, we have a --with switch for DEF_MAXBACKENDS, so one for the
> default number of buffers doesn't seem too unreasonable. I wouldn't
> bother with it if configure didn't have to touch the value anyway...
> but it's just another line or two in configure.in...

Yes, we could add that too, but now that we have postgresql.conf should
we even be mentioning stuff like that in configure. In the old days we
had a compiled-in limit but that is not true anymore, right?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ljb 2001-06-23 00:09:43 Re: PHP, PostgreSQL and transactions
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-23 00:00:46 Re: Re: [GENERAL] [Help] Temporary Table: Implicitely created index not shown in \d i

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-23 01:55:46 Re: [PATCH] by request: base64 for bytea
Previous Message John Scott 2001-06-22 23:43:47 using WAL in a VACUUM?