Re: Incremental sum ?

From: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com>, Domingo Alvarez Duarte <domingo(at)dad-it(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Incremental sum ?
Date: 2001-06-22 17:18:16
Message-ID: 20010622121816.B14381@rice.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 12:58:46PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu> writes:
> > And here's the working example: not the need to GROUP BY, and <=
> > to get the current payment.
>
> > select cust_id,invoice_id,val,paid, (select (sum(val) - sum(paid))
> > from invoices_not_paid where cust_id= i.cust_id and invoice_id <=
> > i.invoice_id group by cust_id) as balance from invoices_not_paid i;
>
> Actually I think you could leave off the inner GROUP BY --- won't there
> always be exactly one group, since only one value of inner cust_id is
> selected?

Sure enough, it works fine. My internal rule: "can't use aggregates
without a group by" mis-fired.

Ross

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ross J. Reedstrom 2001-06-22 17:28:02 Re: What is a "tuple"
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-06-22 17:05:59 Re: View performance question