Re: Indexing on a separate volume

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Indexing on a separate volume
Date: 2001-06-13 14:01:00
Message-ID: 200106131401.f5DE10V03442@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

It is a good idea. See the web-based TODO list under tablespaces for a
discussion.

> I was thinking this morning, how much work would it be to change the directory
> structure of Postgres.
>
> from:
>
> postgres/
> base/
> db1/
> db2/
> db3/
> ...
> pg_xlog/
>
> to
>
> postgres/
> base/
> db1/
> db2/
> db3/
> ...
> index/
> db1/
> db2/
> db3/
> ...
> pg_xlog/
>
> Or
> postgres/
> base/
> db1/
> data/
> index/
> db2/
> data/
> index/
> db3/
> data/
> index/
> ...
> pg_xlog/
>
> This sort of arangment would allow putting indexes on separate volumes. If it
> is a stupid idea, with little value or a huge amount of work, I take it back.
> Seriously, however, does it make any sense?
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB 2001-06-13 14:01:32 AW: AW: vacuum
Previous Message Gavin Sherry 2001-06-13 13:55:45 Re: Indexing on a separate volume