| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: global.bki vs template1.bki init files |
| Date: | 2001-06-12 01:14:03 |
| Message-ID: | 200106120114.f5C1E3o08658@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
]> > I thought we agreed to merge them already.
>
> We did? Good. Will make it so.
I know Peter mentioned it a long time ago.
> > Also, could we modify
> > IndexScanOK() to catch this case and do a heap scan?
>
> How? Also, why?
I remember problems getting the index on pg_index because of recursive
lookups so I thought you could either have bootstrap mode ignore the
pg_shadow index or have recursion identified and fallback to heapscan,
but if you merge them there isn't much point.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alex Pilosov | 2001-06-12 01:29:39 | [PATCH] addition of text_inet, text_cidr and inet_set_masklen |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-06-12 01:10:54 | Re: global.bki vs template1.bki init files |