Re: ERROR: Memory exhausted in AllocSetAlloc(909324558)

From: darcy(at)druid(dot)net (D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain)
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ERROR: Memory exhausted in AllocSetAlloc(909324558)
Date: 2001-06-09 11:12:35
Message-ID: 20010609111235.E02A01A8B@druid.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thus spake Tom Lane
> darcy(at)druid(dot)net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain) writes:
> >> heap_formtuple is for constructing a tuple from scratch. It sounds like
> >> you should be using heap_modifytuple instead.
>
> > But I am using SPI_modifytuple(). The rest came from tracing that
> > function.
>
> Hm. Looks like the author of SPI_modifytuple didn't realize he could
> use heap_modifytuple :-(. But he is correctly extracting the old data.
> I don't see anything wrong there, assuming that you are passing a
> relation descriptor that matches the original tuple.

Well, let's see.

SPI_modifytuple (rel,rettuple,1,&targ_att,&newval,NULL)

Here are (I think) the relevant lines that get me the data for that call.

Datum
mk_cardnum(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
TriggerData *trigdata = (TriggerData *) fcinfo->context;
int nargs; /* # of arguments */
Datum newval; /* new value of column */
char **args; /* arguments */
char *relname; /* triggered relation name */
Relation rel; /* triggered relation */
HeapTuple rettuple = NULL;
int targ_att;
bool isnull;
char cardnum[48];
...
/* assume full error checking - leaving out for clarity */
rel = trigdata->tg_relation;
relname = SPI_getrelname(rel);
targ_att = SPI_fnumber (tupdesc, args[0]);
newval = CStringGetDatum(cardnum);

--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at){druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Crotwell 2001-06-09 14:13:26 Re: unlink large objects
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-06-09 04:31:21 Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal