| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM> |
| Cc: | "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem |
| Date: | 2001-05-19 00:39:09 |
| Message-ID: | 200105190039.f4J0dAr20805@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Well, my current TODO looks as (ORDER BY PRIORITY DESC):
>
> 1. UNDO;
> 2. New SMGR;
> 3. Space reusing.
>
> and I cannot commit at this point anything about 3. So, why not to refine
> vacuum if you want it. I, personally, was never be able to convince myself
> to spend time for this.
Vadim, can you remind me what UNDO is used for?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-05-19 00:55:12 | Re: Re: Problems with avg on interval data type |
| Previous Message | Mikheev, Vadim | 2001-05-19 00:28:48 | RE: [HACKERS] Re: possible row locking bug in 7.0.3 & 7.1 |