Re: Re: PL/Python build

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: mhh(at)mindspring(dot)com
Cc: Joel Burton <jburton(at)scw(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: PL/Python build
Date: 2001-05-13 02:30:12
Message-ID: 200105130230.f4D2UCu23535@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Appently GCC on an i86/Elf based Linux platform, compiles _all_ code as
> relocatable. So you can get alway with all kinds of stuff. But at least on
> HPUX, the vendor compiler does not create relocatable objects unless
> specifically asked to do so. And as a rule no-one does unless they are
> creating a shared library.

Yes, the performance hit for relocatable code is measurable. Good
point. Does anyone know of a good doc/web page that talks about PIC,
shared libs, etc that is somewhat OS-independent?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-05-13 02:58:46 Re: Why do we use Tcl's compiler and flags?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-13 02:27:11 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/ /README /configure /configure.in /regis ...