Re: NOCREATETABLE patch (was: Re: Please, help!(about Postgres))

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: NOCREATETABLE patch (was: Re: Please, help!(about Postgres))
Date: 2001-05-09 13:33:20
Message-ID: 200105091333.f49DXKG21740@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> It's my old patch, it's usable and some people use it for 7.0.x. But
> it's really temporary solution and it was 1 day in official CVS :-)
> We remove it after discussion with Peter E. More correct will implement
> better privilege system.
>
> A privilege system is *very* important for real multiuser and
> sophisticated systems. For example if you compare PostgreSQL with Oracle,
> the PostgreSQL is really not winner in this part. Peter has some idea
> about it and Jan sent something about it too, but I not sure if somebody
> works on this and plannig it for some next release (or...? -- will good
> if I not right:-)

If we can get something more sophisticated in 7.2, great. If not, we
may have to apply it later.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-09 13:36:07 Re: Outstanding patches
Previous Message Mike Mascari 2001-05-09 13:29:01 RE: NOCREATETABLE patch (was: Re: Please, help!(about P ostgres))