From: | Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: elog(LOG), elog(DEBUG) |
Date: | 2001-05-05 09:14:48 |
Message-ID: | 20010505021447.A18676@fw.wintelcom.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> [010505 02:06] wrote:
> There's a TODO item to make elog(LOG) a separate level. I propose the
> name INFO. It would be identical to DEBUG in effect, only with a
> different label. Additionally, all DEBUG logging should either be
> disabled unless the debug_level is greater than zero, or alternatively
> some elog(DEBUG) calls should be converted to INFO conditional on a
> configuration setting (like log_pid, for example).
>
> The stricter distinction between DEBUG and INFO would also yield the
> possibility of optionally sending DEBUG output to the frontend, as has
> been requested a few times.
INFO makes sense as afaik it maps to syslog.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [alfred(at)freebsd(dot)org]
Daemon News Magazine in your snail-mail! http://magazine.daemonnews.org/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2001-05-05 11:00:19 | Re: GiST indexing problems... |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-05-05 08:58:18 | elog(LOG), elog(DEBUG) |