| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | GH <grasshacker(at)over-yonder(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Ryan Mahoney <ryan(at)paymentalliance(dot)net>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Ideal hardware configuration for pgsql |
| Date: | 2001-05-03 00:52:55 |
| Message-ID: | 200105030052.f430qt904120@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 11:35:13PM +0100, some SMTP stream spewed forth:
> > Our db server running 7.1 got *torched* today, system ran between 30% an
> > 80% CPU all day! Right now the server is running on a Penguin Computing
> > 800mhz PIII w/ 128 ram and IDE hardware.
> >
> > Tomorrow I'd like to place an order for something more robust... looking
> > into dual PIII, gig of ram and SCSI Raid. Planning on running Red Hat 7.1
> > on this machine.
>
> I think that anyone whose opinion matters would recommend running
> something *other* than RedHat. FreeBSD is an excellent operating system
> and is well suited to a PostgreSQL environment.
I think I have to agree on that one. Especially Linux's ext2 vs. BSD's
UFS. Of course, I assume you are asking for an optimal solution, not
just something that will work. Linux will work fine for most people.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | GH | 2001-05-03 00:53:21 | Re: Ideal hardware configuration for pgsql |
| Previous Message | jeff.fitzmyers | 2001-05-03 00:50:49 | RE: Security and performance |