From: | Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: JDBC Pooling driver |
Date: | 2001-04-30 20:19:38 |
Message-ID: | 200104302019.f3UKJb338041@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Don't mean to reply to my own message... but...
Just an additional thought. Instead of creating a new pooling
technique in PostgreSQL jdbc driver, could we do a specialized select
that would return the 'getInsertedOid()' instead? (Select
$_gett_inserted_oid) Does that make sense to others? (Kinda like what
oracle's and other jdbc driver do.)
> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 14:00:32 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com>
> Folks-
>
> Got a question about using the PostgreSQL JDBC driver with pooling.
> Using 7.1, I noticed the extra functionality with the JDBC driver,
> like getInsertedOid(). I love it, since it helps with sequence
> numbers an integration with Castor. However, since the PostgreSQL
> JDBC driver doesn't have pooling connections as an option, I use
> PoolMan (or other) to pool connections. When I do this, I no longer
> have access to these PostgreSQL specific features.
>
> Is there any plans for adding this functionality into the JDBC
> driver? Is this something that others are looking for?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Public key at http://www.keyserver.net
iD8DBQE67cjuiysnOdCML0URAmWgAJ46xLa1Qt3g38JatXfPhfZ4kdDvxwCfeu3b
i41kITdbIWdkLXk/8ldZ5Vg=
=/S4b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joseph Shraibman | 2001-05-01 02:35:12 | BigDecimal instead of Integer in 7.1 |
Previous Message | Ned Wolpert | 2001-04-30 18:00:32 | JDBC Pooling driver |