| From: | Mike Castle <dalgoda(at)ix(dot)netcom(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: On the _need_ to vacuum... |
| Date: | 2001-04-29 05:23:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20010428222355.A16044@thune.mrc-home.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 04:33:42PM -0020, geustace(at)godzone(dot)net(dot)nz wrote:
> If the work that Alfred has done is as effective as he claims, then
> there must be a *REALLY* good reason why it isn't being included.
Isn't 7.1 in a code freeze?
That seems like a *REALLY* good reason not to include such a change at this
moment.
Nothing prevents YOU from using it, of course.
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
dalgoda(at)ix(dot)netcom(dot)com and be right all the time, or not work at all
www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/ and be right at least twice a day. -- mrc
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | will trillich | 2001-04-29 06:09:33 | Re: Re: crypt(table.field) ? |
| Previous Message | Alfred Perlstein | 2001-04-29 05:22:53 | Re: Re: On the _need_ to vacuum... |