Re: RFC: planner statistics in 7.2

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RFC: planner statistics in 7.2
Date: 2001-04-20 19:00:38
Message-ID: 200104201900.f3KJ0cY11158@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Remember one idea is for index scans to automatically update the expired
> > flag in the index bitfields when they check the heap tuple.
>
> There is no such flag, and I'm not planning to add one before I fix
> statistics ;-)
>
> There are a number of things that'd have to be thought about before
> such a thing could happen. For one thing, trying to obtain write locks
> instead of read locks during a btree scan would blow us out of the water
> for supporting concurrent btree operations.

Yes, it was just an idea. Someone may add it for 7.2.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-04-20 19:14:45 Re: [HACKERS] Hardcopy docs available
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-04-20 18:52:28 Re: [HACKERS] Hardcopy docs available