Re: RPM upgrade caveats going from a beta version to RC

From: "Oliver Elphick" <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RPM upgrade caveats going from a beta version to RC
Date: 2001-04-11 20:55:46
Message-ID: 200104112055.f3BKtk212611@linda.lfix.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Lamar Owen wrote:
>Last time I looked at the documentation for the serial tag, its use was
>strongly discouraged. But that _has_ been awhile -- maybe it could be
>useful. But I would prefer the whole version numbering thingtobe fixed,
>as the Debian packages have the same issue -- and I don't know if .deb
>has an analog to Serial:.

We have epochs, that is, the package version is preceded by an integer
and a colon, which overrides every other part of the version and release
number. However, if I ever use an epoch, I will be stuck with epochs for ever;
so I don't want to start.

--
Oliver Elphick Oliver(dot)Elphick(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk
Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
PGP: 1024R/32B8FAA1: 97 EA 1D 47 72 3F 28 47 6B 7E 39 CC 56 E4 C1 47
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
========================================
"Is any one of you in trouble? He should pray. Is
anyone happy? Let him sing songs of praise. Is any one
of you sick? He should call the elders of the church
to pray over him...The prayer of a righteous man is
powerful and effective." James 5:13,14,16

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2001-04-11 21:01:46 Re: RPM upgrade caveats going from a beta version to RC
Previous Message Kyle VanderBeek 2001-04-11 20:46:44 Re: Re: Large Object problems (was Re: JDBC int8 hack)