Solaris 7 SPARC passes tests (was Re: Re: [BUGS] Tests randomly failed)

From: Mathijs Brands <mathijs(at)ilse(dot)nl>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Alexander Klimov <ask(at)wisdom(dot)weizmann(dot)ac(dot)il>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Solaris 7 SPARC passes tests (was Re: Re: [BUGS] Tests randomly failed)
Date: 2001-03-28 00:56:10
Message-ID: 20010328025610.C98674@ilse.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 02:40:00AM +0200, Mathijs Brands allegedly wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 07:17:47PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut allegedly wrote:
> > Tom Lane writes:
> >
> > > Alexander Klimov <ask(at)wisdom(dot)weizmann(dot)ac(dot)il> writes:
> > > > Yes, it was really just incidence -- I try again, and 15 of 15 `make
> > > > check' passed with TCP sockets, but only 3 of 15 passed with UNIX
> > > > sockets. So, final decision is `Unix sockets are not relaible on Solaris'
> >
> > What become up 'set maxuprc=256'? I thought that made it work. Could
> > other people try it or has it been disproven?
>
> I'm giving this a test now...

No luck :( Tests still randomly crash. (This is an Ultra 10 machine.)

7.1RC1 on Solaris 7 SPARC does pass the regression tests (apart from the
random test, which seems to be ignored on Solaris). (This is an Ultra
420 machine.)

Cheers,

Mathijs
--
It's not that perl programmers are idiots, it's that the language
rewards idiotic behavior in a way that no other language or tool has
ever done.
Erik Naggum

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mathijs Brands 2001-03-28 01:04:24 Re: Spinlocks on SGI's
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-03-28 00:47:47 Re: Feature Request: ALTER FUNCTION (or something like that)