| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgindent run? |
| Date: | 2001-03-22 15:07:23 |
| Message-ID: | 200103221507.KAA15906@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net> writes:
> > cvs annotate is a really, really handy tool, unfortunetly these
> > indent runs remove this very useful tool as well as do a major job
> > of obfuscating the code changes.
>
> I think this is a good reason for *not* applying pgindent on an
> incremental basis, but only once per release cycle. That at least
> lets cvs annotate be useful within a cycle.
What about having it happen on every CVS commit?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-03-22 15:09:38 | Re: pgindent run? |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2001-03-22 15:06:31 | Re: Re: Call for platforms |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-03-22 15:09:38 | Re: pgindent run? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-22 14:56:06 | Re: pgindent run? |