| From: | Martin Renters <martin(at)datafax(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, Martin Renters <martin(at)datafax(dot)com>, Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: beta6 pg_restore core dumps |
| Date: | 2001-03-19 15:40:56 |
| Message-ID: | 20010319104056.A7239@snowbird.datafax.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 12:31:20PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> After looking more closely I see that pg_restore has two different
> buffer overrun conditions in this one routine. Attached is take two
> of my patch.
>
> This would be a lot simpler and cleaner if _PrintData() simply didn't
> append a zero byte to the buffer contents. Philip, is it actually
> necessary for it to do that?
This patch seems to fix the problem I was seeing.
Martin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-03-19 16:09:45 | Re: Performance monitor signal handler |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-03-19 14:59:03 | Re: Re: Small bug in pg_dump |