Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: libpq++

From: "J(dot) T(dot) Vermeulen" <jtv(at)cistron-office(dot)nl>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "J(dot) T(dot) Vermeulen" <jtv(at)cistron-office(dot)nl>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: libpq++
Date: 2001-03-07 23:13:31
Message-ID: 20010308001331.J3900@cistron.nl (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces
On Wed, 07 Mar 2001, Tom Lane wrote:

> No, you shouldn't take it.  For one thing, Peter E. has been
> reorganizing the configure/build process, and that has impacted pretty
> nearly everything.  The changes aren't likely to be extensive, but you'd
> still be facing a merge task when you are ready to submit diffs.  Seems
> like you might as well try to avoid that by starting from something more
> current than 7.0.3.
> 
> 7.1beta5 would probably be a reasonable starting point.

Whew--thanks!  Indeed, I'm just reading through the CVS overview and I see it
now.

Downloadink 7.1b5 & lookink forward to more merging...


Jeroen


In response to

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Timothy H. KeittDate: 2001-03-08 00:03:26
Subject: unbuffered results from libpq?
Previous:From: J. T. VermeulenDate: 2001-03-07 23:02:50
Subject: Re: libpq++

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group