From: | "J(dot) T(dot) Vermeulen" <jtv(at)cistron-office(dot)nl> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "J(dot) T(dot) Vermeulen" <jtv(at)cistron-office(dot)nl>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: libpq++ |
Date: | 2001-03-07 23:13:31 |
Message-ID: | 20010308001331.J3900@cistron.nl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
On Wed, 07 Mar 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> No, you shouldn't take it. For one thing, Peter E. has been
> reorganizing the configure/build process, and that has impacted pretty
> nearly everything. The changes aren't likely to be extensive, but you'd
> still be facing a merge task when you are ready to submit diffs. Seems
> like you might as well try to avoid that by starting from something more
> current than 7.0.3.
>
> 7.1beta5 would probably be a reasonable starting point.
Whew--thanks! Indeed, I'm just reading through the CVS overview and I see it
now.
Downloadink 7.1b5 & lookink forward to more merging...
Jeroen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Timothy H. Keitt | 2001-03-08 00:03:26 | unbuffered results from libpq? |
Previous Message | J. T. Vermeulen | 2001-03-07 23:02:50 | Re: libpq++ |