Re: Performance monitor

From: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>, Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, Justin Clift <aa2(at)bigpond(dot)net(dot)au>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance monitor
Date: 2001-03-08 22:25:06
Message-ID: 20010308.22250600@ler-freebie.iadfw.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


I don't believe that UnixWare will take the PS change without having
ROOT.

LER

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

On 3/8/01, 3:54:31 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote regarding
Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor :

> Tom Lane writes:

> > How many of our supported platforms actually have working ps-status
> > code? (This is an honest question: I don't know.)

> BeOS, DG/UX, and Cygwin don't have support code, the rest *should* work.

> --
> Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Masto 2001-03-08 22:47:48 Re: Proposed WAL changes
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-03-08 22:18:58 Re: Use SIGQUIT instead of SIGUSR1?