Re: Re: how critical is WAL

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zboszor(at)externet(dot)hu>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: how critical is WAL
Date: 2001-02-23 18:15:58
Message-ID: 200102231815.NAA16184@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> I looked into the postgres manuals and as it suggests, I stopped
> postmaster and I tried to reindex this table in a standalone
> postgres. "reindex table" (without force) did not reindexed.
> "reindex index" dumped core. I dropped the primary index and
> tried to recreate it, but it also dumped core.
>
> I guess it falls under the 3rd category of your listed types of data loss.
> :-(
>
> The question still is : is this kind of failure repairable?
>
> The system is: RH 6.2, kernel-2.2.16-3, postgresql-7.0.3 rpms from
> ftp.postgresql.org.

Oh, I see. I don't know of any way to repair it.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adam Haberlach 2001-02-23 18:42:07 ...lame use of casting, looking for workaround...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-02-23 18:04:46 Re: Date difference in seconds