Re: how critical is WAL

From: Rini Dutta <rinid(at)rocketmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: how critical is WAL
Date: 2001-02-22 21:44:06
Message-ID: 20010222214406.29056.qmail@web2902.mail.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I'm glad about that ! The documentation led me to
believe that it was imperative to move to the version
using WAL, perhaps the documentation could be modified
to remove Result '3' if it has not hapenned to
anybody.

Thanks
Rini

--- Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > > Indexes could get corrupt, requiring rebuilding.
>
> > > That problem is gone
> > > with WAL. Transaction commits where always
> safe.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks. I was specifically asking about Result '3'
> > above mentions 'totally corrupted table page
> content
> > because of partially written data pages' . Is this
> > also repairable ?
>
> I never heard of that happening to anyone.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian |
> http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610)
> 853-3000
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe
> Avenue
> + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel
> Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices! http://auctions.yahoo.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mirko Zeibig 2001-02-22 22:20:05 Re: PostgreSQL 7.1 Linux Installation
Previous Message Mitch Vincent 2001-02-22 21:37:12 Re: SQL Question