Re: how critical is WAL

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Rini Dutta <rinid(at)rocketmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: how critical is WAL
Date: 2001-02-22 20:17:09
Message-ID: 200102222017.PAA13030@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> Hi,
>
> I happenned to come across the following in the
> documentation on WAL implementation in v7.1 -
>
> *****************************************************
> Before WAL, any crash during writing could result in:
>
> 1.index tuples pointing to non-existent table rows
>
> 2.index tuples lost in split operations
>
> 3.totally corrupted table or index page content,
> because of partially written data pages
> *****************************************************

Indexes could get corrupt, requiring rebuilding. That problem is gone
with WAL. Transaction commits where always safe.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lonnie Cumberland 2001-02-22 20:25:38 Re: www-sql question
Previous Message Rini Dutta 2001-02-22 19:57:15 how critical is WAL