Re: Idea for reducing planning time

* Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> [001215 10:34] wrote:
> >
> > sorry, meant to respond to the original and deleted it too fast ...
> >
> > Tom, if the difference between 7.0 and 7.1 is such that there is a
> > performance decrease, *please* apply the fix ... with the boon that OUTER
> > JOINs will provide, would hate to see us with a performance hit reducing
> > that impact ...
> >
> > One thing I would like to suggest for this stage of the beta, though, is
> > that a little 'peer review' before committing the code might be something
> > that would help 'ease' implementing stuff like this and Vadim's VACUUM
> > code ... read through Vadim's code and see if it looks okay to you ... get
> > Vadim to read through your code/patch and see if it looks okay to him
> > ... it adds a day or two to the commit cycle, but at least you can say it
> > was reviewed before committed ...
> >
>
> Totally agree. In the old days, we posted all our patches to the list
> so people could see. We used to make cvs commits only on the main
> server, so we had the patch handy, and it made sense to post it. Now
> that we have remote cvs, we don't do it as much, but in this case, cvs
> diff -c is a big help.

It seems that Tom has committed his fixups but we're still waiting
on Vadim?

--
-Alfred Perlstein - [bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net|alfred(at)freebsd(dot)org]