Re: Unanswered questions about Postgre

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Joel Burton <jburton(at)scw(dot)org>, kislo(at)athenium(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unanswered questions about Postgre
Date: 2000-12-09 23:21:08
Message-ID: 200012092321.SAA01882@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> Joel Burton writes:
>
> > What's nice about PostgreSQL is that, while it hasn't always had
> > every SQL92 feature (like outer joins, etc.), it seems to have less
> > legacy, nonstandard stuff wired in. :-)
>
> Oh man, you have noooo idea. PostgreSQL is legacy headquarters. ;-)

I had a good laugh on this one. Yes, we are legacy headquarters
sometimes, but we don't hesitate to rip things out to improve them.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-12-09 23:24:40 Re: Unanswered questions about Postgre
Previous Message Peter Schmidt 2000-12-09 21:41:52 Postgres failover implementation