Re: AW: AW: AW: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language nam esh

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'Philip Warner'" <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language nam esh
Date: 2000-11-16 17:59:44
Message-ID: 200011161759.MAA18222@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
>
> > But we have very few Informix functions moving to PostgreSQL.
>
> I do not understand this comment.
> What you imho forget here is that a definition for an interface will eventually be
> included in the SQL standard.
> And it will be what Oracle or DB/2 (maybe even Informix) does.

OK, lets call the old style "stdC" and the new one "C".

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Frank Joerdens 2000-11-16 18:08:40 Re: [HACKERS] Re: PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL
Previous Message Don Baccus 2000-11-16 17:58:53 Re: RE: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/access/transam ( xact.c xlog.c)