Re: Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting support

From: djm(at)web(dot)us(dot)uu(dot)net (David J(dot) MacKenzie)
To: peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us
Cc: djm(at)web(dot)us(dot)uu(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting support
Date: 2000-11-14 18:16:50
Message-ID: 20001114181650.06FF812685@jenkins.web.us.uu.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> You can do that in a more stylish and safer manner by using the
> unix_socket_permissions and unix_socket_group options.

Moving the socket file is also necessary for running in
a chrooted environment. And I'm not sure whether it's relevant,
but the 7.0 method of computing the socket file name (based
only on the port number) doesn't work for multiple instances
listening on the same port on different IP addresses.

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-11-14 18:39:40 Re: Details for planned template0/template1 change
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-11-14 18:03:42 Re: Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting support